I think it’s greedy and selfish to want a tenure to try and discriminate against any sort recreational group. I believe there needs to be more clarity on the comment of “unprotected from the uses that may not necessarily jibe with the communities intrests.” Who’s community? yours, mine? If our idea’s of recreation differ does that make one of them wrong. Who makes the decision, a special intrest group? Let anyone who wants to enjoy the outdoors in a responsible manner do so. Lets not discriminate against anybody.