An invitation to share ideas

An invitation to share ideas

When issues arise, Rosslanders get moving. Over the years, I have been truly inspired by the energy and commitment my fellow citizens have made in the quest to stabilize public education in Rossland.

The Planning for the Future process undertaken by School District 20, has been front and centre for the past two years. As most of you know, SD20 is asking the public to submit ideas that address the challenges to our public education delivery.  And while there is a strong opinion that our system is underfunded by the BC government, we are not afraid to look in our own back yard for some cost saving measures that would benefit our district.

As an example, we have one group of citizens working on Neighbourhoods of Learning concept which could involve our public school properties. This is a  
concept that invites the public school to share its ‘space’ with other organizations, public or private. The sharing of facilities these results in cost savings to both partners. Several schools in BC have gone this route. Another initiative is underway to investigate and present various K-12 scenarios so that our public can make educated decisions for the future of our schools.

Over the years, Rosslanders have been creative in their quest to retain K-12. Ski, snowboard, freeride, dance academies have been created. The International Program is going great guns and (after a lengthy battle with the trustees who wanted to shut it down) has finally been recognized as a great asset to SD20. Our chef’s program, while a district Transition to Trades program, is made possible because RSS has an industrial kitchen and a great foods room. Our arts programs run on a linear and off timetable schedule which allows the young artist to retain their ‘chops’. Other initiatives such as a Distance Learning Centre, a multi-media program and more are currently being investigated.

I would like to invite all those who have other such great ideas, to share them with the school board, your friends or with me. I welcome any emails and would be happy to meet with anyone who wishes to discuss/spearhead/organize initiatives that would further stabilize our schools.

Concerns and questions are welcome, too.

Submission to the Planning for the Future can be made to the SD20 website, preferably before Feb. 28th.

janisanderson[at]telus.net

Try this link for some light reading:

http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/blogs/reportcard/archive/2010/02/08/rumours-about-education-news-in-the-throne-speech.aspx

Comments

A plea worth posting

Dunster Fine Arts School Parent Advisory Council (PAC)

Dunster Fine Arts School

8252 Dunster-Croydon Road

Dunster, B.C.

V0J 1J0

 

February 12, 2010

 

Dear Parent Advisory Councils of British Columbia:

 

Re:                Funding for Public Education

 

Our children attend a small rural school – Dunster Fine Arts Elementary School – located in the Robson Valley, in the interior of the province.  This school is being considered for closure due to projected budget shortfalls within School District No. 57 (Prince George).  Many schools – perhaps your own – are facing the same or other difficulties due to lack of funding to school districts.  We are writing to all PACs in British Columbia to seek their parents’ support in demanding that the provincial government substantially increase funding of public education. 

 

We have designated Monday, February 22, 2010 as PARENTS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION DAY!  We ask that all parents write a letter to the Provincial Government asking for increased funding for public education.  Mail your letter FEBRUARY 22, 2010 !!!!

 

British Columbia is reported by the provincial government to have one of the strongest economies in all of Canada.  However, B.C.'s per capita spending on education is far below the national average and falls well behind other Western provinces in keeping up with inflation. 

 

We believe in the importance of public education.  Parents should not have to pay for private schools or subsidize their child's school or busing.  Let's unite as parents in demanding that the provincial government increase funding to public education!

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

Dunster Fine Arts School Parent Advisory Council

Why is the concept of K-12

not fiscally prudent? First, not all parents in Rossland are fond of the idea of having elementary school kids in with high school. Is this the right choice for the young ones? Or, is it desperation? You may have to do some basic number crunching to see if the high school students actually form a significant mass to offer courses. If they have to travel to get some of these courses, then why have a half empty high school? Moreover, it may be OK for one more year, but, the enrollment projections fall off considerably after that. Rossland, like several West Kootenay communities, is not growing. The birth rate is nowhere near what it was when RSS was built in the 50's. It will need significant repair. BC & Canada's work force will decrease significantly before the end of this decade. Who is going to be left to pay for all this? Retired seniors? Rossland is not some remote community. The sooner all WK communities get a grip on reality, the better prepared we'll be to face definite future challenges. We're doing little to change the economic picture in this region...we're all too busy trying to one up the other. It's nuts. I haven't seen the district expense projections. I doubt they're much different from other districts. Just not enough students and a diminishing supply of wage earners.

 Can't say you're wrong this

 Can't say you're wrong this time, FP. We need to do more to grow our community or we won't be able to make a compelling case to save our schools. I don't think we're at the point yet where we need to close our high school, but if we can't slow the loss of families in the area, it will happen soon enough. We need to turn our attention toward creating jobs locally, even as we fight to save RSS (the two go hand in hand). With that in mind, check out Andrew Zwicker's piece this week suggesting one way to generate some economic activity that doesn't involve selling houses to part time American skiers...--ed.

Fiscally prudent

I'm curious. Rossland parents are, in general, understanding the financial need to cut one of our schools and are backing the concept of a K-12 school in the RSS building, which would be 100 per cent utilized. Why is this not fiscally prudent?

My response to VSS

is contained in the following article from the Globe & Mail: Budget must tackle rising costs of greying population, watchdog warns Steven Chase Ottawa — From Thursday's Globe and Mail Published on Wednesday, Feb. 17, 2010 9:52PM EST Last updated on Thursday, Feb. 18, 2010 7:41AM EST Ottawa's battling to rein in record deficits, but there's a bigger problem at play that will make life even more miserable for politicians and taxpayers: Canada's aging population. Parliamentary budget watchdog Kevin Page is releasing a report Thursday that warns it's not good enough for Ottawa to simply balance the books – because of the increasing squeeze Canada's greying ranks will place on coffers. He predicts that even if Ottawa slays the deficit, it will still have to confront an expanding “fiscal gap” in revenue over the next decade of $20-billion to $40-billion annually. This will arise as Canada's work force shrinks in proportion to its growing pool of retirees, a trend that should both slow the growth of government tax revenue and increase demands for health-care spending and old-age benefits. Mr. Page's new report effectively pours cold water on the idea Canada can “grow” its way out of trouble – as the economy expands and generates more tax revenue – or make do with a moderate restraint program. The budget watchdog says the federal government must prepare to eliminate this revenue gap – through tax hikes or spending cuts – in order to keep its debt levels stable relative to the size of Canada's economy. Ottawa will be forced to take actions equal to between 1 per cent and 2 per cent of Canada's estimated annual economic output merely to stabilize its debt burden, the Parliamentary Budget Officer calculates. (Mr. Page is using economic output forecasts for 2013-14 to derive the $20-billion to $40-billion prediction.) His report also says that Ottawa would need to act on an even grander scale if it wanted to go further and shrink the size of its debt relative to economic output. Failing to at least stabilize the problem will lead to growing deficits and “severe debt problems” over the next couple of decades, Mr. Page warns. The year 2011 is the beginning of what has been called a “demographic time bomb” for Canada: an explosion of the 65-plus population over two decades coupled with a sharply declining proportion of Canadians in the work force as boomers retire. “Right now we have a mindset that if we got back to balance, everything would be fine. That's a very short-term perspective,” Mr. Page says. The watchdog takes care to avoid criticizing politicians for past fiscal decisions, but his analysis clearly suggests the combined efforts of the Harper government and former Liberal governments resulted in tax cuts that were deeper than can be sustained. Since 2006, the Tories have reduced taxes on individuals, families and businesses by an estimated $220-billion over 2008-09 and five subsequent years. That works out to roughly $36-billion a year in lost tax revenue. Canada's demographic troubles are a slow-growing menace to this country. The number of workers supporting each elderly Canadian is expected to dwindle to 2.5 to one in 2030 from five to one today because of this country's low birth rate, rising life expectancy and aging boomers. This carries a fiscal cost. As the federal Finance Department warned in the 2005 budget, this looming demographic shift could sap economic growth each year over the 2010-30 period by half a percentage point. Until the recession hit and blew Ottawa off course, this issue was a central preoccupation for the Finance Department, which warned repeatedly that it was the reason why Ottawa had to keep driving down the national debt until it was only 25 per cent of the economy. Less debt means more room to borrow when the spending pressures of an aging population begin to climb. The number of Canadians aged 65 and over has been growing at about 2.5 per cent annually. But this rate will climb to between 3 per cent and 4 per cent starting in 2011, when the first in the massive baby boom generation celebrate their 65th birthdays. Separately yesterday Stockwell Day, the federal cabinet minister tapped to lead the charge on restraining spending, said that he believes Canadians expect “considerable sacrifices” from Ottawa as it slays the deficit. The Treasury Board president said the March 4 budget will identify some areas where Ottawa expects to ratchet back spending plans to help balance the federal books. “You will see some of the specifics; other areas will be more general where we will want ongoing input from Canadians.” http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/budget-must-tackle-rising-costs-of-greying-population-watchdog-warns/article1471991/

a resource

 Here's a resource for anyone interested in the larger issue of school underfunding--let's not lose sight of the forest for the trees.--ed.