Should Rossland ban pesticides? - Bylaw comes before council this week

in
Should Rossland ban pesticides? - Bylaw comes before council this week

How important is a sparkling green lawn, and is it worth using chemicals to get that result?

That question among others will come before Rossland council on Monday February 8th when a proposed bylaw to ban the use of cosmetic pesticides will be on the table. Cosmetic pesticides are typically classified as chemical pesticides used to control unwanted weeds and plants in order to improve the appearance of lawns and gardens and are non-agricultural and non-essential.

Humans have been using various substances to improve their agriculture and reduce pests for thousands of years. The first recorded use of the word “pesticide” was in Mesopotamia, approximately 4,500 years ago. At that time famers would spread elemental sulfur on their crops to reduce insect damage. The use of cosmetic pesticides, however, is a much more recent phenomenon.

There has been a concerted effort and push by a coalition of health and environmental groups against the use of cosmetic pesticides in BC over the past year. That group has been lobbying both the province and BC municipalities to introduce bans on the use and sale of cosmetic pesticides. Adding some muscle to their cause, the group includes heavy hitters such as the Public Health Association of BC; West Coast Environmental Law, Canadian Cancer Society, Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, Toxic Free Canada; and the David Suzuki Foundation.

Targeting both the province and municipalities is part of their fight against pesticides. The way the law works, municipalities can ban the use of pesticides in within their boundaries; however they cannot ban the sale of related products. This fact has been a loophole that has affected other municipalities. The Halifax Regional Municipality, for example, banned the use of pesticides early in the 2000’s. The pesticides themselves, however, remained on sale in stores, and without an army of enforcement officers, there was no practical way to enforce the bylaw.

The largest effect in Halifax’s experience was that commercial lawn care agencies no longer use chemical pesticides. Quebec and Ontario have taken a provincial approach to the matter and have successfully banned the sale of the products in store.

In BC, cosmetic pesticides have already been banned for use by 28 municipalities. Locally, Nelson and the district of Invermere have already passed such legislation. Kimberley and Golden have passed first reading of their proposed bylaw while Fernie, Cranbrook, Castlegar and now Rossland are just bringing their proposed legislation to council.

Locally, Diana Daghofer, co-chair of Prevent Cancer Now, is getting behind the push and hopes to get concerned citizens out to council this Monday evening to show their support for the proposed bylaw. In a press release, Daghofer cautioned that, in a town such as this with many dogs running around, “a number of studies have linked pesticides to cancer among children, adults and pets. Do you know that dogs whose owners used chemical herbicides (which generally have 2,4-D in them) on their lawns were 4 to 7 times more likely to have bladder cancer than dogs whose owners did not?”


Another group calling themselves “Force of Nature” and claiming (although nameless in their releases) to offer “an independent perspective” has been running a frequent and emotionally charged e-mail campaign against the ban of pesticides. The major claims of the group is that “Enviro-terrorists” are “unleashing a plague of terror,” on the country around the desire to ban pesticides. They pose the bans as attacks on the lawn care, golf and green space industry. Their e-mail campaign attempts to debunk common misconceptions about law care such as “ENVIRO–LIE : The prohibition of pest control products will be a boon to our economy (Wrong !) Boosting business and creating green jobs. (Wrong !). RESPONSE TO ENVIRO–LIE: The claim from Enviro–Maniacs that prohibiting pest control products stimulates business is a LIE and MISCONCEPTION concocted by the Environmental Terror Movement.”

The lines have been drawn in the sand by two opposing groups, and the issue is now at the forefront of Rossland and other BC municipalities council decisions as well as at the provincial level.

If you are interested in this issue and wish to show your support for or against the proposed bylaw, the item will be on the agenda this Monday night.
 

Comments

LINKS CONCERNING COTTAM, PHYSICIANS, AND CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY

I want to thank NatureWiseGardener for their link to the Government of Canada website regarding pesticide safety 2003. I would also like to direct him/her to another link it is the Government of Canada website regarding pesticide safety. This information will really surprise most who read it as it is a direct response from The MINISTER OF HEALTH to: MS. K.J. COTTAM answering all of her questions in 2004. Go to the following link ... http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/pet_129_e_28856.html She has blatantly disregarded this information and continues to confuse the public and question the Federal Governments intentions regarding safety, but claims to trust/rely on the Municipal Governments who may truly be oblivious to their Federal counterparts decisions and scientific reasoning. I would also like to direct readers to the RESPONSE FROM THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA commenting on the 2004 Ontario College of Family Physicians LITERATURE REVIEW. Go to the following link ... http://www.cen-rce.org/eng/bulletins/extras/Information_Note.pdf 2,4-D has been re-evaluted in 2008 yet again and is still a safe product when used as directed. Finally, If there was alternative and safer products to replace Chemicals like 2-4,D, the Green Industry would be the first to adopt those products. The Green Industry is not fighting back because they love to use products to spite the Activists. The reality is the Activists will not stop at Pesticides they will find a new target to aim their sites at. This is how they get paid. The Canadian Cancer Society received 2 Million Dollars in 2009 from the Government of Canada to help reduce cancer rates. They have to go after someone or they lose their funding. Go to the following link ... https://ocl-cal.gc.ca/app/secure/orl/lrrs/do/_ls70_ls75_ls62_ls6c_ls69_ls63_ls53_ls75_ls6d_ls6d_ls61_ls72_ls79?_ls72_ls65_ls67_ls44_ls65_ls63=580017&_ls73_ls65_ls61_ls72_ls63_ls68_ls50_ls61_ls67_ls65=publicBasicSearch&_ls73_ls4d_ls64_ls4b_ls79=1259868502343&_ls6c_ls61_ls6e_ls67_ls75_ls61_ls67_ls65=_ls65_ls6e_ls5f_ls43_ls41&_STRTG3=tr Uncle Adolph

I thought this was an

I thought this was an interesting and timely article, found via a blog I regularly read. http://www.safelawns.org/blog/index.php/2010/02/canada-to-ban-all-weed-n-feed-nationwide/

MORE CONSIDERATIONS FOR ROSSLAND TOWN COUNCIL.

MORE CONSIDERATIONS FOR ROSSLAND TOWN COUNCIL. Here are some facts that everyone needs to know ... DUBIOUS BOGUS GREEN ALTERNATIVES PROMOTED BY ENVIRO–MANIAC–ACTIVISTS ! It is a MYTH to believe that there are valid alternatives to conventional pest control products ! This is simply FALSE ! Green Alternatives are BOGUS, and they are NOT SAFER, NOT BETTER, and NOT MORE EFFECTIVE ! The so–called Lower–Risk but BOGUS Green Alternatives that are being proposed to replace conventional pest control products are NOT all as low risk or non–toxic as some people assume them to be. Despite claims to the contrary, there are NO viable, efficacious, or economical products to replace present pest control products. Additionally, the safety of many BOGUS Green Alternatives is DUBIOUS ! Some may well be MORE TOXIC than conventional pest control products. A MAJORITY of the BOGUS Green Alternatives have negatives ranging from almost TOTAL INEFFECTIVENESS except under very specific circumstances, to a question about their TOXICITY. Overall, so–called Lower–Risk Alternatives and BOGUS Green Alternatives are LESS EFFECTIVE and STUNNINGLY MORE EXPENSIVE than conventional pest control products. Government Officials, the Green Space Industry, and the public were assured by Enviro–Maniac–Activists that safe and effective Green Alternatives were already available to replace conventional pest control products. THIS IS FALSE ! The alternatives are BOGUS ! All Enviro–Maniac–Activists that promote these BOGUS Green Alternatives DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT ! Conveniently, many BOGUS Green Alternatives are distributed by the Enviro–Maniac–Activists themselves ! The same organizations that seek to conspire for prohibition. Many Enviro–Maniac–Activists and their organizations are simply RICH and GREEDY and AVARICIOUS SALESMEN that hawk their own line of so–called alternative green products ! However, these BOGUS Alternatives are short–lived since the public learns very quickly that they DO NOT WORK ! In any cases, we do not need so–called Green Alternatives since ... PESTICIDE–TREATED–LAWNS ARE AS SAFE AS PESTICIDE–TREATED GOLF COURSE TURF ! Both the Golf Industry and the Professional Lawn Care Industry use the SAME ingredients that are needed to control insect and weed pests. In fact, Professional Lawn Care maintenance requires LESS PESTICIDE–INPUTS than Golf Course turf. The Golf Industry enjoys the benefits from a PROHIBITION EXCEPTION STATUS despite the fact that it uses the very same ingredients used in Professional Lawn Care maintenance. If it is safe to walk and play on a pesticide–treated golf course putting green, it is also safe to walk on a pesticide–treated lawn. PESTICIDE–TREATED–LAWNS ARE AS SAFE AS PESTICIDE–TREATED–CANCER DAFFODILS ! Both Daffodil Production for Canadian Cancer Society and the Professional Lawn Care Industry use the SAME ingredients that are needed to control insect and weed pests. In fact, Professional Lawn Care maintenance requires LESS PESTICIDE–INPUTS than Daffodil Production. Daffodil Production for Canadian Cancer Society enjoys the benefits from a PROHIBITION EXCEPTION STATUS despite the fact that it uses the very same ingredients used in Professional Lawn Care maintenance. If it is safe to touch and hold a pesticide–treated daffodil, it is also safe to walk on a pesticide–treated lawn. PESTICIDE–TREATED–LAWNS ARE AS SAFE AS PESTICIDE–TREATED AGRICULTURAL CROPS ! Both the Agriculture Industry and the Professional Lawn Care Industry use the SAME ingredients that are needed to control insect and weed pests. In fact, Professional Lawn Care maintenance requires LESS PESTICIDE–INPUTS than many agricultural crops. The Agriculture Industry enjoys the benefits from a PROHIBITION EXCEPTION STATUS despite the fact that it uses the very same ingredients used in Professional Lawn Care maintenance. If it is safe to eat and digest pesticide–treated food, it is also safe to walk on a pesticide–treated lawn. William H. Gathercole and Norah G National Organization Responding Against Huje that harm the Green Space Industry ( NORAHG ) Montreal, Quebec

NORAHG

I love it when an industry group tries to discredit groups and individuals by attributing to them all sorts of disreputable actions that they themselves are guilty of. It's like a conman calling the judge a thief and a liar in court. Let's all show our support Monday, to send a message that we won't stand for outside industry groups and representatives telling us we must continue poisoning our local environment. And even though we can't pass laws banning their sale, let's tell our local gardening stores we don't want to see those products on local shelves. And for William H. Gathercole and Norah G (not a real person), if you really believe your pesticides are so inoffensive, I invite you to eat and drink any leftover stock local suppliers still have.

Should Rossland Ban Pesticides?

In response to NatureWiseGardener, I must regretfully say that Mr. Gathercole and his gang are obsessed with pesticides and consider them the holy of holies: indeed God's greatest gift to the creation. I don't exaggerate! They also constantly sing praises of Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency which does have a substantial group of toxicologists (rat specialists) on staff but is very weak in epidemiology (i.e. human science). Unfortunately, the PMRA doesn't do research of its own but merely examines rat data supplied by the industry. There is no mechanism at the PMRA to search and review pesticide literature submitted by independent scientists, and no bibliographies are compiled. Each report that happens to come across someone's desk is examined on its own, and if a single report by itself doesn't overturn the agency's decision it is to be discarded into the "disregard" file. When pesticides are used in combinations, such combinations go untested (e.g. PAR III), even though a synergistic (reinforcing) effect is likely. Moreover, the "inert" ingredients responsible for increased potency of the ready-to-apply formulations are usually not identified and remain trade secret. Their very "inertness" is now being questioned.

Pesticides ...

So tell me, what exactly IS the "Green Space Industry"?? Oh yes, and the other day I looked up summaries of studies on the effects of Roundup, widely believed to be a "safe" pesticide ... a neighbour of ours in Courtenay used to spay it on his corn crops ... and studies indicate that, if the spray drifts into local ditches or streams, any amphibians living there will be harmed by it ... no wonder the cheery sound of frogs has nearly vanished from the landscape in recent years. There are known to be other causes, but it's hard to say what Roundup might contribute to the vulnerability of frogs to those other causes.

Shouls Rossland Ban Pesticides?

I am honorary Canadian observer on the umbrella U.S. Pesticide Working Group. I live in suburban Ottawa and have a substantial lawn maintained in an excellent condition, without any pesticides and with very little effort. Few people know that herbicides were unavailable for weed control prior to WWII and were initially used for military purposes. The lawns in my neighbourhood tend to be quite large and despite the Ontario ban, in effect since the spring of 2009, are kept in an entirely satisfactory condition. Mr. Gathercole and his group have a vested interest in the status quo and want to maintain it all costs. To this end, they have been harassing targetted individuals daily by sending them colourful daily newsletters, each with a pretty girl, and tedious diatribes against so-called "enviro-maniacs" and "basterds". The support this group obtains from the lawn-care industry at large appears to be limited. The group maintains that all pesticides are always safe and that there is no global warming. They are especially hostile toward the Canadian Cancer Society and Canadian doctors organizations as well as all individuals aware of any undesirable health effects of pesticides. The group is contemptuous of independently obtained evidence that pesticides are linked to cancer, endocrine system (glands) disruption, neurological and immune systems damage, asthma, as well as behavioural and learning disabilities. Children are especially vulnerable. When children walk beside a sprayed lawn they are exposed via inhalation to the residues of herbicides, or their breakdown products, which are absorbed directly by the brain, bypassing the liver which is the cleansing organ. A municipal ban is a step in the right direction. However, municipalities have not been empowered to regulate the sales of pesticides for cosmetic purposes. Therefore, it is necessary for provincial authorities eventually to step into the regulatory void (as Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency merely examines rat data provided by the industry with a limited applicability to humans). In North America we allow the industry to register and use pesticides while vital health data are outstanding and may or may not arrive. In the European Union, companies are given deadlines to submit the necessary health data. In the event of their failure to do so, the registration is withdrawn.

Response to : Should Rossland ban pesticides ?

Letter to the Editor. Response to : Should Rossland ban pesticides ? The Rossland Telegraph. Rossland, British Columbia. The issue before Rossland Town Council is NOT the importance of « a sparkling green lawn ». The issue before Council is NOT the worth using chemicals to get that result ? The issue before Rossland Town Council is the INTIMIDATION, and perhaps COERCION, created by a few dozen, or so, Environmental–Maniac–Activists. Several of these activists claim to represent Health–Care–Worker and Environmental organizations that seek to prohibit FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE, and TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE conventional pest control products. These activists claim to represent Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, Canadian Cancer Society, David Suzuki Foundation, Prevent Cancer Now, Toxic Free Canada; and West Coast Environmental Law. These activist present themselves as a so–called Enviro–Alliance of these organizations to give everyone the impression that the Environmental–Terror–Movement has considerable size and power, when in fact, it does not. Enviro–Alliances are often ONE–IN–THE–SAME GROUP. For example, Canadian–Cancer–Society is operated by SOME OF THE SAME PEOPLE that operate Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment and Toxic Free Canada. Moreover, Prevent Cancer Now and Toxic Free Canada are PUBLIC AFFAIRS SHIELDS for Canadian Cancer Society. Many are ONE–IN–THE–SAME GROUP with the intent to IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE and COERCE Government Officials. In fact, the Environmental–Terror–Movement in British Columbia is composed of a MERE DOZEN, or so, Enviro–Maniac–Activists that often seek to impose their CLOWNISH LIFE–STYLE CHOICES on Government Officials by the concoction of LIES, FEAR–MONGERING, MISCONCEPTIONS, COERCION, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, TERROR, and PARANOID CONSPIRACIES. NOT ONE PERSON within these organizations has ANY recognized expertise, training, or background, in matters concerning PEST CONTROL PRODUCTS, TURF MAINTENANCE, or the GREEN SPACE INDUSTRY ! And yet, these activists will INTIMIDATE and COERCE Government Officials by concocting FRAUDULENT and NON–EXISTENT issues. Additionally, Enviro–Maniac–Activists will DECEIVE Government Officials by blurting out HOLLOW and DESPICABLY–ALARMIST expressions like « cancer » and « serious illness » and « reproductive problems » and « neurological diseases » and « children at risk » ! Enviro–Maniac–Activists will give Government Officials the impression that children and adults are being exposed to cancer–causing agents whenever a pest control product is used. Enviro–Maniac–Activists will COERCE, INTIMIDATE, and ALARM Government Officials by concocting the idea that they need to get rid of so–called unnecessary poisons that pose alleged unnecessary risk to our health, our children's health, and the health of the environment. Enviro–Maniac–Activists will despicably use examples of terminally–ill children, or children in general, as « weapons of mass destruction » in order to convince Government Officials that pest control products need to be prohibited. The issue before Rossland Town Council is the MOTIVATION of these activists. Many Enviro–Maniac–Activists and their avaricious organizations have become MILLIONAIRES ! Their pretentious prohibitionist rants have been rewarded with MILLIONS OF DOLLARS from government and private donations ! The more these Enviro–Maniacs concoct LIES, FEAR–MONGERING, MISCONCEPTIONS, COERCION, THREATS, and TERROR about conventional pest control products, the more they become RICH ! Moreover, Enviro–Maniac–Activists and their organizations have a responsibility to their donors and investors, just like any other business. It should be noted that many Enviro–Maniac–Activists are simply GREEDY SALESMEN that represent their own line of products and services before an unsuspecting Government Officials ! When conventional pest control products are prohibited in a community, the Enviro–Vermin friends of these activists move in with their own STUNNINGLY EXPENSIVE and HIGHLY PROFITABLE but BOGUS Green Alternatives ! Several Environmental–Terror–Organizations operate VAST ORGANIC LAWN MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS ! Again, the issue before Rossland Town Council is the MOTIVATION of these activists. Enviro–Maniac–Activists are simply GREEDY and AVARICIOUS. They concoct programs and presentations that reward them with SAFE, SECURE, GUARANTEED, and WELL–PAYING ENVIRO–TERROR–JOBS. For example, Millionaire Canadian–Cancer–Society uses the millions that it collects from donations to pay a substantial amount of money for activists to work as « HIRED GUNS » to INTIMIDATE and COERCE Government Officials into prohibiting FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE, and TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE conventional pest control products. And yet, not one of these Cancer–Maniac–Activists has ANY expertise in matters pertaining to pest control products. Cancer–Maniacs are truly DESPICABLE ! What is the MOTIVATION of these activists ? Enviro–Maniac–Activists are paid TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS by Canadian–Cancer–Society FOR EVERY FORUM ORGANIZED in British Columbia. Enviro–Maniac–Activists are paid ONE THOUSAND OF DOLLAR by Canadian–Cancer–Society FOR EVERY PRESENTATION MADE TO EACH MUNICIPAL TOWN COUNCIL. Enviro–Maniac–Activists are rewarded to COERCE, INTIMIDATE, and ALARM Government Officials by concocting the idea that they need to get rid of so–called unnecessary poisons that pose alleged unnecessary risk to our health, our children's health, and the health of the environment. The Enviro–Maniac–Activists that are making a presentation to the Government Officials in the Town of Rossland, British Columbia, are being paid ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS, plus expenses, by Canadian Cancer Society. The Enviro–Maniac–Activists that are making a presentation to the Government Officials in the Town of Rossland will be given a BOUNTY of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS by Canadian–Cancer–Society upon the successful legislation of prohibition by Rossland. The Cancer–Maniac–Activists that are making a presentation to Rossland are also being paid a salary of OVER FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS PER YEAR, plus expenses, by Canadian–Cancer–Society, to COERCE, INTIMIDATE, and ALARM Government Officials. Cancer-Maniac-Activists have SAFE, SECURE, GUARANTEED, and WELL–PAYING ENVIRO–TERROR–JOBS as long as they continue to COERCE, INTIMIDATE, and ALARM Government Officials. The issue before Rossland Town Council is the SEEKING THE TRUTH. Enviro–Maniac Organizations like Millionaire Canadian–Cancer–Society are RADICAL MILITANT ENVIRONMENTAL FUND–RAISING ORGANIZATION. Canadian–Cancer–Society is NOT a scientific body ... it is a vast money–making business operated by a few dozen, or so, well–paid Enviro–Maniac–Activists used as « HIRED GUNS » to COERCE and INTIMIDATE Government Officials. Cancer–Maniac–Activists have compensated for their lack of expertise by frequently relying upon LIES, FEAR–MONGERING, MISCONCEPTIONS, COERCION, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, TERROR, and PARANOID CONSPIRA–CIES about pest control products. Perhaps the health of the public may be better served if all the resources of the Cancer–Maniac–Activists, currently focused on the prohibition of FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE, and TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE pest control products, were redirected towards improving the lifestyle choices of the population, such as diet and exercise. Prohibitionist Cancer–Enviro–Maniacs consider the hundreds of qualified scientists of the Pest Management Regulatory Agency of Health Canada to be incompetent and/or incapable of arriving at correct scientific findings concerning conventional pest control products. Prohibitionist Cancer–Enviro–Maniacs constantly discredit the work of Health Canada, and yet, this federal agency has determined that the pest control products used for producing their beloved and lucrative DAFFODILS are SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE. Prohibitionist Cancer–Enviro–Maniacs have ABSOLUTELY NO SCRUPLES using pest control products when it suits THEM, since Pesticide–Treated–Daffodils are as source of MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in donations ! Cancer–Maniacs are truly DESPICABLE ! The issue before Rossland Town Council is the SEEKING THE TRUTH. For many years, Millionaire Canadian–Cancer–Society HAS SOLD FOR PROFIT so–called « PESTICIDE–TREATED–TOXIC–CANCER–DAFFODILS ». Contract–Daffodil–Growers for Canadian–Cancer–Society use conventional pest control products on a regular and continuous basis, and have done so for decades. The GREEDY and AVARICIOUS Canadian–Cancer–Society and its growers have ABSOLUTELY NO SCRUPLES using pest control products when it suits THEM, since Pesticide–Treated–Daffodils are as source of MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in donations ! The issue before Rossland Town Council is the SEEKING THE TRUTH. Cancer–Enviro–Maniacs ask Government Officials to prohibit the same pest control products that are used for Daffodil production. The issue before Council is the CONSEQUENCE OF PROHIBITION. Municipal Government Officials are clearly NOT knowledgeable enough to enact prohibitive legislation. This is NOT their field of expertise. A local government has an onus of responsibility to verify the JUNK SCIENCE information that has been concocted by Cancer–Enviro–Maniacs. In several jurisdictions, Government Officials have failed to base prohibition decisions on SOUND SCIENCE. In Ontario, municipalities have consequently been stripped of their prohibitionist powers. The ONLY Government Officials that truly have ANY recognized expertise, training, or background, in matters concerning pest control products are the HUNDREDS of expert scientists at Health Canada ! NO pest control product can be sold or used until Health Canada’s scientists have evaluated ALL the existing evidence to determine whether the product meets stringent health and safety requirements. Conventional pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE since they have been scrutinized and approved by the HUNDREDS of expert scientists at Health Canada ! Ironically, conventional pest control products used to produce PESTICIDE–TREATED–CANCER–DAFFODILS are SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE since they have been scrutinized and approved by the HUNDREDS of expert scientists at Health Canada ! For this reason, PESTICIDE–TREATED–CANCER–DAFFODILS sold by Millionaire Canadian–Cancer–Society are NOT TOXIC. Consequently, lawns treated with pest control products are NOT TOXIC either. Finally, the issue before Rossland Town Council is the CONSEQUENCE OF PROHIBITION. In January 2010, the Green Space Industry outlined the list of charges against the Government of Ontario and Enviro–Maniac–Government–Officials working in the Ministry of the Environment. Additionally, individual Enviro–Maniac–Activist–Members of known Environmental–Terror–Organizations are also facing charges of FRAUD under the Canadian Criminal Code. These Enviro–Maniacs conspired with Government Officials by using DISGRACEFULLY FALSE and MISLEADING information in order to impede access to Health–Canada–Approved products through FRAUDULENT MEANS. The reputations of several of these alleged culprits is in doubt, since they have conspired to seek the NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS prohibition of FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE, and TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE conventional pest control products. Prohibition was achieved by DECEITFUL Enviro–Maniac–Government–Officials who concocted a classification of pest control products based on a methodology that FRAUDULENTLY AVOIDED SOUND REGULATORY SCIENCE. NOT A SINGLE ONE of the alleged Enviro–Maniac–Government–Officials and Enviro–Maniac–Activists in Ontario can be recognized as an expert, scientist, or researcher with credentials in the field of pest control products. These Enviro–Maniacs have routinely compensated for their lack of expertise by frequently relying upon LIES, FEAR–MONGERING, MISCONCEPTIONS, COERCION, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, TERROR, and PARANOID CONSPIRACIES about pest control products. The prohibition of pest control products in several jurisdictions is TERRORIZING and ANNIHILATING the entire Modern Green Space Industry, leading to LOSS OF REVENUES, BUSINESS FAILURES, BANKRUPTCY, and UNEMPLOYMENT, inflicting TERROR, DESPAIR, and DESTITUTION on THOUSANDS of hapless victims throughout the Green Space Industry. These alleged culprits have done GREAT HARM to the Green Space Industry. Enviro–Maniacs and their Environmental–Terror–Organizations are WRONG about conventional pest control products ! Conventional pest control products are SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE ! Overall, when they are used properly, there are NO harmful irreversible effects to health and the environment ! There something HORRIBLY WRONG with a system where Enviro–Maniac–Government–Officials conspire with Enviro–Maniac–Activist–Members of known Environmental–Terror–Organizations to dictate public policy based upon LIES, FEAR–MONGERING, MISCONCEPTIONS, COERCION, THREATS, and TERROR. William H. Gathercole and Norah G National Organization Responding Against Huje that harm the Green Space Industry (NORAHG) Montreal, Quebec

A beautiful example of this

A beautiful example of this in action is the Granby River Golf Course just outside of Grand Forks. I've had the pleasure of catching up with the owners a few times who are really nice, welcoming folks and they showed me around the course and the operation. It's entirely chemical free which just as you've pointed out has created a much healthier turf and ecosystem in general. They could literally walk away from their golf course for years, and come back to a green vibrant property, whereas many golf courses turf relies so heavily on chemicals and fertilizers that if you left it for a few weeks without feeding it, the grass would die.

Not to go on too much about Granby, but the real X-factor of the organic course when i finally put my finger on it was just how alive the course felt. Loads of birds, deer, frogs, turtles etc. That along with a real quality course was great proof that things can not just be done without pesticides but actually done far better without them.

Should Rossland ban pesticides?

Cosmetic and non-cosmetic pesticides do not exit. However, the same pesticides, of which herbicides were invented for use on the battlefield, may be used for cosmetic or non-cosmetic purposes. By the way, I have had a sparkling green lawn without the use of any pesticides for many years. It is a myth that pesticides are necessary to obtain a good looking lawn. In fact, pesticides kill the beneficial organisms in the soil, so a lawn obtained without the employment of toxic poisons, and not crippled by being cut too short, is truly healthy. The higher turf keeps the weeds out the natural way! On the other hand, there are those with so-called "independent perspective", notorious for calling medical doctors and other independent and impartial experts "basterds" and "enviro-terrorists", etc. Their claim that pesticides are entirely safe is self-serving and misleading. They have a vested interest in the continued use of pesticides for cosmetic purposes and they refuse to acknowledge that their products may cause irreparable harm, especially to young children. Reliable studies show that pesticides play a significant role in promoting cancer and endocrine system disruption (adversely affecting glands), and cause the neurological and immune systems damage. In addition, they seriously aggravate asthma and are responsible for children's behavioural problems and learning disabilities. Skin contact and inhalation of chemicals are especially harmful to children as these residues bypass the liver, which is the cleansing organ.

Pesticide education

Thanks Andrew for the informative and timely article on pesticides and Rossland. As a horticultural professional and someone who has worked around pesticides my entire life, as well as gained certification in BC to dispense pesticides, I have to say I concur wholeheartedly with everything cottomkj stated. A person doesn't have to dig very far to discover what an ugly truth pesticide use is in our country. Perhaps 'Force of Nature' would care to educate themselves. I suggest: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/c20031001ce.pdf